R.A.E.L. solar-electric spacecraft performing proximity operations near an asteroid

MAIN ASTEROID BELT / MULTI-TARGET EXPLORATION

R.A.E.L.

A proposed solar-electric spacecraft series for asteroid rendezvous, close observation and selected surface-contact experiments.

Random Asteroid Explorer and Lander

A series of missions to study the diversity of the asteroid belt.

R.A.E.L. is a proposed series of up to five missions over approximately 30 years. Later vehicles could reuse avionics and payload interfaces while extending their range or surface capability. Target selection would depend on orbital accessibility and scientific value. No flight schedule or payload booking is confirmed.

Preliminary programme architecture

CURRENT STUDY

Mission at a glance.

Destination
Main asteroid belt
Programme
Up to 5 missions over approximately 30 years
Primary power
Large solar arrays and rechargeable batteries
Propulsion
Solar-electric xenon ion propulsion
Operations
Rendezvous, proximity flight and selected surface contact
Growth path
Orbiter-lander separation in later generations
Science theme
Solar-system formation and small-body diversity
Status
Preliminary programme architecture

MISSION PROFILE

From departure to science operations.

The sequence is a mission concept. Timings and performance targets require trajectory and system analysis.

01

Select a target chain

Choose a sequence of asteroids whose orbits and scientific objectives are compatible with the spacecraft capabilities.

02

Spiral outward

Solar arrays would power ion thrusters during long transfers. Available power and thrust duration would set the achievable route.

03

Characterise first

Imaging and navigation measurements would estimate the asteroid shape, rotation and local environment before close operations.

04

Rendezvous carefully

The spacecraft would use a bound orbit where practical or a controlled relative trajectory where the gravity field makes orbiting unsuitable.

05

Contact selectively

Surface contact would be considered only after reconnaissance. Landing gear and any anchoring system would need to limit rebound in weak gravity.

06

Depart and repeat

After an observation campaign, the propulsion system would guide departure and begin the next planned transfer.

SPACECRAFT ARCHITECTURE

Candidate spacecraft systems.

These systems describe the proposed design and the work needed to assess it.

01

Solar electric power

Solar arrays would be sized for main-belt conditions. Batteries would support planned intervals when generation is insufficient.

02

Ion propulsion

Throttleable xenon ion thrusters are proposed for inter-asteroid transfers and rendezvous manoeuvres. Lifetime and propellant requirements remain to be established.

03

Autonomous navigation

Camera and lidar measurements would support navigation around bodies with uncertain shape and gravity.

04

Surface contact

The proposed landing system combines a slow approach with compliant legs and possible anchoring. Surface interaction would require testing.

05

Science

Candidate instruments would study surface composition and structure through imaging, spectroscopy and particle measurements.

06

Series architecture

Later missions could carry a separate lander, allowing the orbiter to continue observation and relay duties after deployment.

PROPOSED SCIENTIFIC PARTNERSHIP MODEL

A proposed framework for partner instruments and observations.

A future agreement would define instrument accommodation and integration along with operations and data delivery. Starshot would operate the spacecraft. Development would depend on an agreed scope and sufficient committed funding.

01

Instrument bookings

Partner instruments could be selected against mission-specific limits for mass, power and viewing geometry.

02

Target packages

A partner could propose a focused observation campaign at a target included in the approved mission route.

03

Surface packages

Surface experiments would require additional accommodation and qualification reflecting the risks of contact.

04

Programme continuity

A shared design could support later missions if scientific demand and funding justified continued development.

ReservationPaid capacity hold following competitive selection
IntegrationStaged fees for interface review, qualification and delivery
Flight serviceContract covering launch, operations, downlink and data delivery
ExtensionRenewable operations or relay service after the prime mission

Financial assessment would compare committed funding with the full cost of development and operations. It would also account for launch, integration and insurance alongside contingency and financing costs.

ENGINEERING PRECEDENT

References informing the study.

NEXT STEPS

Each asteroid mission would need a feasible target sequence and a qualified spacecraft design.

Mission-specific figures are preliminary targets or assumptions. They may change as the trajectory and system designs are developed. The references describe relevant science and prior missions; they do not validate this proposed spacecraft.

Back to Space Systems